Source: AISDLC/AI-SDLC-SOPs@3692389 — sops/SOP-1001-01-AI_Document-Governance-and-AI-IRB-Compliance.md

SOP-1001-01-AI_Document-Governance-and-AI-IRB-Compliance
Title: Document Governance and AI-IRB Compliance

View diagram at source (pin)

Effective Date: InsertDateInsert DateInsertDate
Previous Version: None
Reason for Update: New SOP for AI-SDLC Document Governance
Owner: AI Document Governance Team
Location: InsertLocation/RepositoryInsert Location/RepositoryInsertLocation/Repository
Signature/Date: AuthorizedSignatureandDateAuthorized Signature and DateAuthorizedSignatureandDate


🏠 AI Mind Matrix | ⚖️ AI Governance Gaps | 📋 SOP Index


1. Objective

This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) defines and governs the creation, review, approval, control, storage, and archival of all documentation required in the AI-SDLC (Artificial Intelligence Systems Development Life Cycle). Given the heightened oversight for AI solutions, this SOP also incorporates AI-IRB (AI Institutional Review Board) compliance checks and approvals for any sensitive or high-risk AI systems.

Key goals:


2. Scope

This SOP applies to all individuals involved in producing, reviewing, or managing project-related documentation in the AI-SDLC. It encompasses:

All documents must adhere to the processes in this SOP to maintain compliance with regulatory, AI-IRB, and corporate governance standards.


3. Applicable To


4. Definitions

TermDefinition
DocumentAny written, graphic, or digital artifact capturing information relevant to AI-SDLC (e.g., requirements, designs).
Document OwnerThe individual, team, or Authorized AI Agent responsible for creating and maintaining a specific document.
Authorized AI AgentAn AI system or autonomous agent granted specific governance privileges, approved by the AI-IRB.
Document ControlThe process of systematic creation, review, approval, distribution, revision, and archival of documents.
AI-IRBAI Institutional Review Board ensuring compliance with ethical, legal, and safety standards for AI projects.
RevisionAny version update to a document triggered by change requests, new data, or continuous improvements.
RepositoryThe official location (physical or digital) where documents are stored for version control and retrieval.

5. Roles and Responsibilities

RoleResponsibilities
AI Document Governance TeamOversees the entire document control process, ensures AI-IRB compliance, manages templates, and performs periodic audits.
AI-IRBReviews AI-related documentation for ethical, compliance, and safety concerns. Approves or mandates changes before release.
Senior ManagementProvides strategic direction. Sponsors any large-scale changes to the document governance framework.
Project SponsorChampions the project and ensures document compliance at key milestones.
AI-PMOMonitors overall project documentation progress, escalates issues, and ensures alignment with organizational standards and budgets.
Program/Project ManagerEnsures the creation, review, and final approval of project documents. Coordinates cross-functional sign-offs.
DevelopmentAuthors technical design docs, code architecture docs, integration detail docs, and responds to QA or IRB documentation feedback.
Quality AssuranceReviews test strategies, test results, and ensures all necessary doc updates are made before gating to next phase.
OperationsPrepares environment configs and deployment records. Reviews final install documents.
Technical SupportCreates user guides, release notes, and training materials. Coordinates user documentation reviews with QA, Dev, and PM.

6. Metrics

  1. Document Review Cycle Time
    • Definition: Average number of business days from doc submission to final approval.
    • Goal: Less than 5 days for standard documents, or as specified by the AI-IRB for high-risk AI projects.
  2. Revision Accuracy
    • Definition: Ratio of documents accepted on first revision vs. total documents submitted.
    • Goal: 80% first-approval rate to minimize rework.
  3. AI-IRB Compliance Turnaround
    • Definition: Time from AI-IRB submission to AI-IRB decision.
    • Goal: Adhere to IRB-specified window (often 10–15 business days).
  4. Audit Findings
    • Definition: Number and severity of non-conformities found in periodic doc governance audits.
    • Goal: 0 major findings; minor findings resolved within 2 weeks.

7. Procedure Activities

7.1 Document Creation

  1. Initiate
    • The Document Owner identifies the need for a new or revised document. This trigger may originate from human insight, AI-driven gap analysis, or recursive self-improvement subroutines.
    • The Document Owner consults the AI Document Governance Team for the correct template and relevant compliance notes (including AI-IRB concerns if the doc addresses high-risk AI functionality).
  2. Draft
    • The Document Owner creates the draft using official templates (Word, Markdown, or other standard).
    • Incorporate any references to AI-IRB guidelines or approvals if the project has a risk classification above the standard threshold.
  3. Internal Review
    • Circulate draft among relevant internal reviewers. For AI-generated content or high-risk algorithms, an Exochain Peer Review cycle is mandatory to validate code integrity and logic.
    • Incorporate feedback. Record major change reasons in the doc’s revision history.
  4. AI-IRB Review (if applicable)
    • If doc addresses ethically or regulatory sensitive aspects, the Document Owner must submit it to the AI-IRB.
    • The AI-IRB either:
      • Approves, or
      • Requests modifications, or
      • Rejects with rationale
    • The Document Owner updates the doc and repeats this step until the AI-IRB approves.
  5. Approval
    • The Document Owner routes the final draft for sign-off by the designated Approver(s), typically the Project Manager, QA lead, or an SME.
    • Ensure that any pending changes are merged before sign-off.
  6. Version Assignment
    • Once approved, the doc is assigned a version number and an effective date.
    • The doc moves into the official repository.

7.2 Document Revision/Change Control

  1. Change Trigger
    • A new requirement, a bug fix, an AI-IRB directive, or any project pivot triggers doc revision.
    • The Document Owner opens a doc revision request, referencing the existing doc version.
  2. Update
    • The Document Owner updates relevant sections.
    • If the doc is high-level or affects external AI compliance, the AI-IRB might be consulted again.
  3. Review and Approval
    • Repeat the same review cycle.
    • The doc obtains a new revision number upon final approval.

7.3 Document Distribution

7.4 Records Management

7.5 Audits and Reviews


8. Forms

No new forms introduced in this SOP. The following standard forms or templates (maintained by the AI Document Governance Team) may be referenced:


9. Exemptions


10. Tools/Software/Technology Used

Tool/SoftwarePurpose
AI Document RepositoryCentral storage of SOPs, project docs, approvals
Doc Version ControlTracks changes, merges, and approvals
AI-IRB PortalSubmits relevant docs for IRB approval
Office Suite/EditorsCreation and editing of doc templates

Revision History

VersionDateAuthorChange Description
1.0DateDateDateAI Document Governance TeamInitial Release

Approval Signatures

RoleNameSignatureDate
AI Document Gov. LeadNameNameNameSignatureSignatureSignatureDateDateDate
AI-IRB RepresentativeNameNameNameSignatureSignatureSignatureDateDateDate
Project ManagerNameNameNameSignatureSignatureSignatureDateDateDate
Senior ManagementNameNameNameSignatureSignatureSignatureDateDateDate

End of SOP 1001-01-AI

@startuml
’ Optional styling
skinparam monochrome false
skinparam shadowing false
skinparam boxPadding 10
skinparam sequenceArrowThickness 1
skinparam sequenceParticipantBoxBackgroundColor #FFFFFF

’ Define Participants
participant “AI Document Governance Team” as GOV
participant “Document Owner” as OWNER
participant “AI-IRB” as IRB
participant “Project Manager” as PM
participant “Quality Assurance” as QA
participant “Operations” as OPS

’ 1. Document need identified
OWNER -> OWNER: “Identify need for new or revised document”

’ 2. Request official template
OWNER -> GOV: “Request official template/guidelines”
GOV -> OWNER: “Send template, compliance guidance”

’ 3. Document Owner drafts content
OWNER -> OWNER: “Draft doc using official template”
OWNER -> OWNER: “Collect SME inputs, add references”

’ 4. Internal Review
OWNER -> PM: “Submit draft for internal review”
PM -> OWNER: “Review, provide feedback”
OWNER -> QA: “Optional SME review (technical correctness)“
QA -> OWNER: “Comments, minor edits”

’ 5. AI-IRB check
OWNER -> OWNER: “Check if doc addresses high-risk AI feature?“
alt High-Risk Content
OWNER -> IRB: “Submit doc to AI-IRB”
IRB -> IRB: “Review doc for legal/ethical compliance”
alt Approved
IRB -> OWNER: “Doc accepted by AI-IRB”
else Changes Requested
IRB -> OWNER: “Revise doc & re-submit”
OWNER -> OWNER: “Incorporate changes, re-submit to AI-IRB”
IRB -> OWNER: “Doc accepted”
end
else No High-Risk
OWNER -> OWNER: “No AI-IRB submission needed”
end

’ 6. Final Approval
OWNER -> PM: “Send final doc for sign-off”
PM -> QA: “Sign-off on final content?”
QA -> OPS: “Sign-off on operational aspects?”
OPS -> PM: “Sign-off completed”

’ 7. Versioning & Release
PM -> GOV: “Notify doc is fully approved”
GOV -> GOV: “Assign new version, mark old as superseded”
GOV -> GOV: “Publish final doc to repository”

’ 8. Periodic Review
GOV -> OWNER: “Periodic review needed (12 months or triggered event)“
OWNER -> OWNER: “Assess if update is required”
alt Update needed?
OWNER -> OWNER: “Initiate Revision”
else No update needed
OWNER -> GOV: “No change, confirm doc remains current”
end

’ 9. Audits & Archival
GOV -> GOV: “Conduct doc compliance audits”
GOV -> PM: “Report any major findings”
PM -> OWNER: “Address findings, revise doc if needed”
GOV -> GOV: “Archive docs per retention policy”

@enduml

Diagram Explanation
The above PlantUML diagram uses six swim lanes (AI Document Governance Team, Document Owner, AI-IRB, Project Manager, Quality Assurance, and Operations) to illustrate the SOP-1001-01-AI document lifecycle. It starts with identifying the need for a new or updated document, proceeds through drafting, review, and AI-IRB evaluation for high-risk AI content, then final approval and versioning. After distribution, the process covers periodic review, potential updates, and eventually archival. Decision points (if/else) highlight whether AI-IRB submission is required (for high-risk AI features) and if any post-approval updates are necessary.